Communication Tower Manufacturer

What is a 3-Legged or 4-Legged Lattice Telecommunication Tower?

Home Blog

What is a 3-Legged or 4-Legged Lattice Telecommunication Tower?

What is a 3-Legged or 4-Legged Lattice Telecommunication Tower?
Jul 03, 2025

Here's a technical comparison and specification overview of 3-Leg vs. 4-Leg Lattice Telecommunication Towers – the structural workhorses of cellular networks, optimized for stability, payload, and terrain adaptability:


Structural Fundamentals

Parameter 3-Leg Lattice Tower 4-Leg Lattice Tower
Base Geometry Triangular Square/Rectangular
Typical Height 30–80m 40–120m+
Wind Resistance 180 km/h (112 mph) 220 km/h (137 mph)
Payload Capacity 1,500–3,500 kg 3,000–8,000 kg
Foundation Area 20–40m² 30–70m²
Material Use 15–30% less steel Higher redundancy

Design & Engineering Comparison

1. Structural Mechanics

Load Handling 3-Leg 4-Leg
Lateral Stability Moderate (dependent on bracing) Superior (redundant load paths)
Torsional Rigidity Lower (susceptible to twist) 40% higher resistance
Foundation Pressure Concentrated at leg points Evenly distributed
Failure Redundancy Single-point failure critical Multi-path load distribution

2. Bracing Systems

  • 3-Leg:

    • K-bracing or X-bracing

    • Max unsupported panel height: 6m

  • 4-Leg:

    • Redundant Warren/Vierendeel trusses

    • Max unsupported panel height: 8m

3. Terrain Adaptability

Condition 3-Leg Suitability 4-Leg Suitability
Sloped Ground Good (Δelev. <1.5m/leg) Excellent (Δelev. <3m/leg)
Soft Soil Requires pile foundations Spread footings often adequate
Seismic Zones Limited to Zone 3 (IBC) Certified for Zone 4
Ice Load Regions 25mm radial ice max. 50mm radial ice

lattice telecom tower 


Technical Specifications

Standard 60m Tower Comparison

Feature 3-Leg (60m) 4-Leg (60m)
Steel Weight 8–12 tons 12–18 tons
Leg Section 150mm Ø tubular (ASTM A500) 200mm Ø tubular (ASTM A572)
Bolt Grade ASTM A325 (M24–M30) ASTM A490 (M30–M36)
Climbing System External ladder Internal ladder + platforms
Installation Time 7–10 days 10–15 days

Telecom Payload Optimization

Configuration 3-Leg Limit 4-Leg Advantage
Antenna Quantity 6–9 sectors + 2 dishes 12–18 sectors + 4 dishes
5G mMIMO Support Up to 32T32R 64T64R + C-RAN hubs
Microwave Backhaul Max 0.6m dishes 1.2–2.4m dishes
Future Expansion Limited headroom 20% reserve capacity

 

Foundation Requirements

Type 3-Leg 4-Leg
Soil Bearing 200 kPa min. 150 kPa min.
Concrete Volume 15–25m³ 20–40m³
Anchor Bolts 3× groups (4 bolts/leg) 4× groups (4 bolts/leg)
Reinforcement 120 kg/m³ 150 kg/m³

 lattice cell tower


Cost Analysis

Component 3-Leg (60m) 4-Leg (60m)
Steel Fabrication $45,000–$75,000 $70,000–$110,000
Foundation $25,000–$45,000 $35,000–$65,000
Installation $30,000–$50,000 $45,000–$80,000
Total CAPEX $100k–$170k $150k–$255k
Lifespan 25–30 years 35–40 years

Deployment Recommendations

Use Case Preferred Type Why?
Urban Macro Sites 4-leg Heavier 5G mMIMO payloads + wind resilience
Rural Coverage 3-leg Cost efficiency; moderate antenna loads
Mountain Peaks 4-leg Superior torsional stability
Coastal Sites 4-leg Corrosion redundancy; high wind survival
Temporary Deploys 3-leg Faster install/teardown

Critical Constraints

Limitation 3-Leg Mitigation 4-Leg Mitigation
High-Wind Sway Tuned mass dampers Redundant bracing
Ground Settlement Pile foundations Grade beams + soil improvement
Seismic Motion Base isolation (Zone 0-3) Moment-resisting joints
Corrosion HDG + periodic inspection HDG + cathodic protection

Innovations

  • Hybrid Legs:

    1. 3-leg towers with 4th stub leg for critical sites

  • Robotic Assembly:

    1. Autonomous bolting drones (20% faster construction)

  • Smart Towers:

    1. IoT strain gauges + LiDAR deformation monitoring

  • Modular Upgrades:

    1. Stackable sections for height increases


4 leg lattice tower


Case Study: Philippines Typhoon Zone

  • Site: 70m tower in Cebu (230 km/h wind zone)

  • Comparison:

    Metric 3-Leg Result 4-Leg Result
    Wind Sway 1.8° (exceeded 1.5° limit) 0.7°
    Survival Damaged (Typhoon Rai) Operational
    Payload Downgraded to 6 antennas Supported 12 antennas
  • Conclusion: 4-leg chosen for all future sites


Standards Compliance

Standard 3-Leg 4-Leg
Structural TIA-222-H (Class 3) TIA-222-H (Class 4)
Wind/Ice ASCE 7-22 (Risk Cat II) ASCE 7-22 (Risk Cat III)
Seismic IBC 2021 (Zone 0-3) IBC 2021 (Zone 0-4)
Corrosion ISO 1461 (Class H) ISO 12944 (C5-M)

Decision Guidelines

Choose 3-Leg When:

  1. Budget is primary constraint

  2. Wind zones < 150 km/h

  3. Antenna loads ≤ 2,500 kg

  4. Stable bedrock terrain

Choose 4-Leg When:

  1. Hosting massive MIMO 5G/6G

  2. Coastal/typhoon regions

  3. Seismic Zone 3+

  4. Multi-operator (MOCN) shared infrastructure

 



Learn more at   www.alttower.com

 

Contact Us 

 

Leave A Message

Leave A Message
If you are interested in our products and want to know more details,please leave a message here,we will reply you as soon as we can.
Submit

Home

Products

whatsapp

contact